Search for: "Matter of Reading Co." Results 1701 - 1720 of 12,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2015, 4:47 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
I've read several of his books; his passing was a loss.CORRECTION: An earlier version of this post misread data from a DPS gang assessment report and that sub-item has been removed as has the reference to it in the headline. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 12:28 pm by luiza
If expensive drugs are associated with hefty co-pays, as Medicare intended them to be, patients might opt for cheaper alternatives. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:44 pm by Eddy Salcedo
 After hearing the matter, the International Trade Commission rejected TianRui’s reading of Congressional intent on § 337, and issued a limited exclusion order relating to the wheels produced with the Amsted manufacturing process. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 11:18 am by Alfred Brophy
Last week I talked some about Signposts: New Directions in Southern Legal History, which Sally Hadden and Patti Minter co-edited. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:01 am by David Post
(David Post) As Eugene noted a while back here on the VC, he helped author (and I co-signed) an amicus brief in the case of Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:30 am by Larisa Vaysman
The Sixth Circuit has held that statutes “deal[ing] with the same subject matter” will not always be read in pari materia. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:57 am by Howard Wasserman
Becton Dickinson & Co. (1988), the Supreme Court held that as “a general matter, . . . it is indisputable that a claim for statutory attorney’s fees is not part of the merits of the action to which the fees pertain. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 3:55 pm by Grant Tudor
This argument posits a novel and likely unavailing read of Congress’s lawmaking prerogatives. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:01 am by Richard A. Rogan
He also serves as the co-managing partner of JMBM's San Francisco office and co-chair of its Bankruptcy Practice Group. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:00 pm by John Ottaviani
The Court also found that there was no conflict between the insurance statute and UETA, and that the two provisions can be read “harmoniously” to mean that an electronic record can fulfill the requirement of written rejection for coverage. [read post]