Search for: "SCALES v. STATE" Results 1701 - 1720 of 4,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Perhaps the most important exclusion from patentability, discussed further below, is India’s Section 3(d).The authors cited Pfizer v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:15 am by Katherine Pompilio
Daphne Keller explained how the Adalah v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm by Guest Blogger
The Court largely endorsed that logic two terms back in Harris v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:28 am by INFORRM
The last case awarding damages in this region was in 2013 where the false allegation of human trafficking was made by the Defendants (Al-Amoudi v Kifle and another [2013] EWHC 293 (QB)). [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:43 am by Marc Mayerson
The court followed a Colorado case in finding that a "large-scale inundation of water [is] a 'flood.'" See Kane v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:43 am by Marc Mayerson
The court followed a Colorado case in finding that a "large-scale inundation of water [is] a 'flood.'" See Kane v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
Meanwhile, modern precedents such as the Court’s 1971 decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 2:44 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In this regard, the UK Supreme Court’s recent landmark decisions in Vedanta v Lungowe and Okpabi v Shell have granted jurisdiction and allowed such claims to proceed on the merits in the English courts. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:06 pm by Kalvis Golde
California; and (2) whether the Navajo Nation can state a cognizable claim for breach of trust consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm by Guest Author
Moreover, as we explain in our article, Camden evaluated governmental power using a sliding scale. [read post]