Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
Lenovo International, et. al. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:51 am
Newmark, et al., C.A. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:44 am
Inc., et al., No. 09-cv-01597 (N.D. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:01 am
Comer et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:21 pm
Sixteen months ago, a three judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's order dismissing the ACLU's lawsuit in Mohamed et al. v Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 4:31 am
Some procedural basics in perfecting an appeal to the Commissioner of EducationKathleen Vendel, et al., v the Board of Education of the Marion Central School District, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision #16,134The decision of the Commissioner of Education in Vendel sets out a number of procedural elements that must be satisfied in order to perfect an appeal to the Commissioner. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
BIC Corporation et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:52 am
Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice—Civil ¶ 101.40[5][a]. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:36 am
Gravity Defyer Corporation et al., 1-10-cv-00642 (GAND August 27, 2010, Order) (Batten, J.) [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:44 am
Friedman Supply, et al., No. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 7:38 am
Ford, et al. on October 15, 2010. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
If it rules that the proponents lack the required Article II standing, it will dismiss the appeal, and Judge Walker's decision will stand without having been affirmed. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:46 pm
See Bellagio LLC et al v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
Brooks Brothers, Inc., Nos. 09-1428 et al (Stauffer). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:22 am
" United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
“If allowed to stand, the injunction would encourage courts to use vague public nuisance standards to scuttle the nation’s carefully created system for accommodating the need for energy production and the need for clean air,” appeals court Judge J. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
The Glad Products Company et al (Docket Report) Simonian - False patent marking standing motion decided without briefing: Simonian v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. [read post]
