Search for: "See v. See" Results 1701 - 1720 of 122,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Magnacoustics, Inc. v Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, 303 AD2d 561, 562). [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:00 am by Unknown
But the industry group’s main issue with the proposed legislation is that there is no need to rush a law through without full analysis and debate.The basis for the holding in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
… Canadian Privacy Law Blog OKImportant new Ontario court decision on privilege in incident response documentation The Ontario divisional court has just released a decision, LifeLabs LP v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am by Ilya Somin
" The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reiterated that rule in its February decision in Spells v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 2:55 am by Rose Hughes
As it becomes increasingly easier to design and predict the behaviours of new drugs in silico, might we therefore see a lower enablement threshold for functional claiming in the US? [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
This week the Tenth Circuit vacates that opinion and requests supplemental briefing on how the Supreme Court's recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Though often hailed as an originalist triumph, Dobbs v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case implicates both rules, but the New York Court of Appeals rules in favor of the driver.The case is People v. [read post]