Search for: "Sharpe v. State" Results 1701 - 1720 of 2,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States Donald Trump is to claim presidential immunity in a defamation case brought against him by former contestant on the Apprentice who accused him of unwanted sexual contact. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
§ 101 rejections of software-based method claims in light of In re Bilski (FoundPersuasive) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Computerised business method patent fails Bilski test under 35 USC 101: H&R Block Tax Services v Jackson Hewitt Tax Services Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Internet archive website is admissible evidence in touchscreen keyboard patent case: SP Techs, LLC v Garmin Int’l,… [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:34 pm by Eric Turkewitz
The decision stands in sharp contrast to the First Department’s February decision in Tselebis v Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 11:03 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
That is now changing with new directives from the Trump administration, much to the sharp consternation of elder care advocates. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 11:38 am by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
The Journal tells us that the White House has approved a force of up to 50 U.S. personnel to “advise and assist” local forces in northeastern Syria, marking the first sustained U.S. ground deployment in the country and "the start of a sharp escalation in the level of U.S. involvement in the fight against Islamic State. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:28 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
Both meetings involved sharp criticism of China’s “coercion and aggression” in the region. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
This wrongly states that Impress made the damages award. [read post]