Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2014, 3:23 am
New Jersey. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:23 am
New Jersey. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:23 pm
New Jersey. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:47 am
And, since the False Claims Act allows a private individual to prosecute FCA actions, the qui tam suit was brought by and on behalf of both the sales representative and the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:15 am
New Jersey. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:15 am
New Jersey. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:15 am
New Jersey. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:11 pm
Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:11 pm
Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 3:11 pm
Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
., Ltd of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd. of Yamaguchi, Japan sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Panacea Biotec, Ltd. of New Delhi, India ("Panacea") infringed Effient® products, Patent Nos. 8,404,703 and 8,569,325, which have been issued by the United States Patent Office. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Herbalife issued the following statement: Today's decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the FTC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Katzburg comported with the protections the United States Supreme Court mandated in Turner v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
” Smith relied on an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:38 am
National Collegiate Athletic Association; New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 6:42 pm
Clio then filed a declaratory-judgment action against P&G in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging that the same patents were invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed. . . . [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:49 am
In United States v. [read post]