Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 1701 - 1720 of 4,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2023, 12:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
Moreover, the State Supreme Court's rule requires the nonmoving party to prove at a hearing not that it did not intend to appeal to racial bias, but that racial bias (perhaps even subconscious bias) had no impact on the jurors. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 1:52 pm
It is interesting to note that New Jersey's hate crime statute, as it then existed, was reviewed by the United States Supreme Court in the 2001 case of New Jersey v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 8:02 pm by JP Sarmiento
The criteria for favorable exercise of discretion was explained in Matter of C-V-T-, 22 I&N Dec. 7 (BIA 1998). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am by Sasha Volokh
But the constraints on public prosecutors, which we saw in connection with United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:57 am
., the Supreme Court will hear Rivera v. [read post]