Search for: "State v. Case"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 193,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2010, 2:21 am
Regina (Ngouh) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2010] EWHC 2218 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 239 “It was important when considering a decision based on para 322(5) of the Immigration Rules, under which indefinite leave to remain should normally be refused where it was undesirable in view of the applicant’s “character, conduct or associations”, to look closely at the context in which that paragraph was being deployed and to see the reasoning that had lead… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
Muuse v Secretary of State for the Home Department; [2010] EWCA Civ 453;; [2010] WLR (D) 108 “When considering an award of exemplary damages in respect of the oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional conduct of government officials where the conduct complained of was considered by the court to be outrageous, it was not necessary to show further that the outrageous conduct disclosed malice, fraud, insolence, cruelty or the like. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:03 am
Regina( C) v Secretary of State for Justice; [2008] WLR (D) 262 “The introduction of an amendment to the Secure Training Centre Rules to permit physical restraint of young offenders in secure training centres to ensure good order and discipline without prior consultation with the Children's Commissioner was unlawful and engaged art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) [2009] UKSC 9; [2010] WLR (D) 52 “It was only if some quite exceptionally compelling feature, or combination of features, was present that interference with the right to family life under art 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms consequent upon extradition would be other than proportionate to the objective that extradition served. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:51 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP (No 2) [2010] UKSC 26; [2010] WLR (D) 154 ”The public interest in publishing a full report of control order proceedings, identifying the suspected terrorist involved, had to give way to the need to protect the suspected terrorist from the risk of violence in circumstances where he was required to live in a town in which there were considerable community tensions and racist attacks on members of the Muslim community had… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:58 am
Deane v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 699; [2010] WLR (D) 162 “In determining whether a claimant seeking Carer’s Allowance was ‘receiving full-time education’, so as to be excluded, it was erroneous to ask how many hours were actually spent on the activities which were defined within the applicable Regulations. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 2:02 am
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:55 pm
In the last post, we discussed the facts of the court case Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:04 am
Court Order in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 2:18 am
The third case, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:29 am
Yesterday, the State of Maryland filed its Brief of Appellee in Syed v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:10 am
Some of the briefs in Moore v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:18 am
In Reno v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:06 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
United States - 2/26/15. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
The court then turns to United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:07 pm
Harman, the court has granted review in another Abu Ghraib case — United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:55 am
On March 12, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 7:12 am
United States addresses the constitutionality of gender distinctions... [read post]
