Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 61,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm
[The Court doesn't decide whether that means they are subject to an "undue burden" test (as under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:46 am
The district court correctly entered judgment for the State. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am
States like California have a great deal on the line in Janus v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:32 am
Here are the materials in Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 2:47 pm
Vitronics Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:01 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 6:14 am
Further, we shall examine state court cases (such as Varnum v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
This does not mean that the acts in question are no longer attributable to the state, and that the state is absolved of responsibility for them. [read post]
26 May 2017, 11:27 am
It's instead just a straightforward "What does this statute mean? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:18 am
Tecnomatic, S.p.A. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:46 am
Here, in State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
In Noe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 12:48 pm
” United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
STATE V. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:00 am
Following a hearing, the Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision, and this CPLR Article 78 proceeding ensued.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, sustained the Comptroller's decision, noting, as is relevant here, it is well established that an injury which occurs in the course of an activity undertaken in the performance of the ordinary employment duties of a police officer is not an accidental injury within the meaning of… [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:00 am
Following a hearing, the Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision, and this CPLR Article 78 proceeding ensued.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, sustained the Comptroller's decision, noting, as is relevant here, it is well established that an injury which occurs in the course of an activity undertaken in the performance of the ordinary employment duties of a police officer is not an accidental injury within the meaning of… [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 1:03 pm
State. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 12:31 am
Yesterday State Farm filed a motion in the McIntosh v. [read post]
