Search for: "State v. R. M. C."
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2012, 6:42 am
For this article, I’m going to focus primarily on “webcasting”, or internet radio services like Pandora. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 6:55 am
§ 11603(c); N.Y. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
Wynder & Geoffrey C. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Cady and Kerith M. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
Watkins, Diane C. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:00 am
I'm not sure I've heard of this before. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
” If, however, you tell them that you were arrested for DUI, those same friends will say, “Oh, I’m so sorry. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:21 pm
§ 512.[4] Viacom Int’l Inc., v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm
Young v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 1:46 am
Sovmots Investments Ltd v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:55 pm
I'm in the 9th Circuit and we have Garcia-Quintero v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:55 pm
I'm in the 9th Circuit and we have Garcia-Quintero v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
Public Acts 1917, c. 225. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am
A Protectionist Country Blocks Two More Big Deals, Petronas Rejection Casts Doubt on CNOOC $15.1 Billion Bid, Market braces for Petronas fallout, Mulcair Slams Feds on Handling of Petronas Deal, Petronas Deal on Hold Not Dead. ____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences … [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:05 pm
____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences § 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - = Backspace Tab q w e r t y u i o p [ ] Return capslock a s d f g h j k l ; ‘ \ shift ` z x c v b n m , . / shift English Deutsch Español Français … [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
Indeed, this Court notes that the November 29, 2010 e-mail from defendant to plaintiff's wife — which e-mail defendant herself describes as having formed the first consultation contract — afforded the couple an $800 "[c]ourtesy, current client discount" from defendants' "[r]egular [c]ost. [read post]
