Search for: "State v. Sales" Results 1701 - 1720 of 20,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
 EUIPO claimed, that the earlier mark was ‘rather “lost” in the overall impression produced by the various elements of the pattern’.Fulia markThe Court disagreed with the contested decision, the EUIPO and the interveners, stating that the mark stands out on the canvas. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Noble Roman's also states that B & MP used the Noble Roman's trademarks in connection with the sale of non-Noble Roman's pizza and other menu items and that such use of the trademarks was without the authorization or consent of Noble Roman's. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:40 am
The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act precludes the maintenance -- in state or federal court -- of class actions alleging state law violations but premised on deception "in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 5:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Whether Connecticut impermissibly regulates or controls conduct beyond the boundaries of the State in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause when, as a condition of allowing a manufacturer’s products to be sold in the state, Connecticut forces the manufacturer to obtain and provide private sales and shipping information possessed by non-Connecticut distributors doing no business in Connecticut and having no nexus with Connecticut. 2. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm by Sherica Celine
State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resource Kit is a frequently updated collection of current Practical Guidance materials on generative AI, ChatGPT, and similar tools. [read post]
16 May 2009, 2:57 pm
Algard running errands, he stated that four described coins had gone missing. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:00 am
In light of recent comments, questions, and Facebook posts, I thought I’d take a moment to clarify some misconceptions about the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]