Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 1701 - 1720 of 8,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2007, 2:19 pm
Hatch argues, among other points, that a decision of the United States Supreme Court, Reno v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 He also argued that the suspension by the Library constitutes a violation of his rights under the United States and New York Constitutions including due process and equal protection.In constructing her ruling, the Commissioner of Education Elia said that “Education Law §310 states in part that the Commissioner is 'authorized and required to examine and decide' a petition 'made in consequence of any action ... [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 8:15 am by IPWatchdog
United States Postal Service—one of two IP cases the Court heard that week. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:06 am
In its 44-page opinion, the district court distilled the issues in the case, involving not only review of the Board's decision but Bayer's counterclaims under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, to one single question:Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over a mark that is registered in the United… [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am by Thomas Merrill
  At one point, for example, Blatt said she hated to point out a flaw in the United States’s argument, because she used to work for it. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
Issue: (1) Whether a cartel’s delivery of price-fixed goods overseas for incorporation into finished products imported directly to the United States is immune from private suit under U.S. antitrust law; and (2) whether, absent special circumstances, a motions panel may assign itself to decide the merits of a case. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit erred in holding that the petitioners are not entitled to judicial review of their statutory, regulatory and constitutional claims, even by habeas corpus, and are “prohibited from invoking the protections of the suspension clause” to challenge their removal; and (2) whether the 3rd Circuit erred in concluding, contrary to every other circuit to address the issue, that persons who have entered the United States may be… [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:58 pm by JP Sarmiento
Case: I-130/I-485 Client: British Location: Miami, FL Our client entered the United States in November 2013 from the United Kingdom under the visa waiver program. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 8:22 am by Joel R. Brandes
Therefore, because the Convention did not enter into force between the United States and Thailand until April 1, 2016, after the allegedly wrongful retention of the children in New York on October 7, 2015, the Convention did not apply to petitioner's claim. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 12:39 pm by Amy L. Peck
This Rule affects legal immigrants (those who are legally in the United States and those who are seeking admission to the United States) and illegal immigrants (who have never been eligible for the benefits covered by the Rule). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
United States and United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:11 pm by Joel R. Brandes
He practiced primarily in the metro-Atlanta area, and specialized in “family law, international family law, and Hague Abduction Convention work in the United States,” and he “served as an expert witness on Hague Abduction Convention matters. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:02 am by Harry Cole
And one additional observation: Things are getting crowded in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:01 am by Joel R. Brandes
Herisse also argued that RM's medical issues might not be as adequately addressed in Canada  as in the United States. [read post]