Search for: "US v. David May"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 7,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2007, 12:58 pm
For a complete discussion of the use of federal consent decrees in settling land use disputes, see David L. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 9:46 pm
Posted By: David C. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 9:26 am
Following from this, a trade mark proprietor should be aware that besides the possibility of revocation for non-use, his trade mark may also be susceptible to invalidation based on bad faith where he had no use or intention to use the registered trade mark in relation to the full scope of the claimed specification. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
Ratliff and Lewis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:52 pm
Mawji v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:19 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with comments by Eric] Davis v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:03 am
Man who shot dogs sues blogger whose critical account of episode allegedly put him in false light [Christopher Comins v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 9:50 am
See Shrove v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 7:04 am
Souter dissenting in Rita v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
DeLuca v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am
Times and in its blog, David Savage covers the cert. grant in Snyder v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 1:44 pm
(David Remes, a human rights lawyer involved in defending detainees, has compiled new tables summing up the legal situation as of now. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:02 am
David L. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
DAVID A., Respondent. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:46 am
David Gutierrez wasn’t a sympathetic defendant. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 12:42 am
Taking this Gigi Dior case as an example, there has already been extensive news coverage on this dispute to date not just in the US but also in countries such as the UK, Australiaand India, all of which are shedding a “David v Goliath” light on brand owners, for example: “Gigi deemed the lawsuit ridiculous”, “Porn star Gigi Dior has been slapped with a lawsuit by a French fashion house which claims she is damaging their business. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Perhaps the Supreme Court will limit itself to deciding the relatively benign question of required procedures, parsing constitutional text and arguments in the standard manner.[23] Except that recent history suggests that the Court might instead use SEC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm
On 12 June 2015, there was a hearing to consider sentencing following a decision on committal in the case of QRS v Beach before Sir David Eady. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 11:26 am
Intact Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 9:59 pm
Secondly, on Friday Mr Justice Floyd gave ruled on the scope of injunctive relief to which MMI was entitled in (Patents Court, England and Wales) in MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd and others [2009] EWHC 1533 (Pat), where Cellxion (i) craftily tried to limit the scope of the injunction by invoking Crown use and (ii) had a go at getting a stay of the injunction pending a possible appeal. [read post]
