Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title & Interest" Results 1701 - 1720 of 2,611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
 Since 2002 there had been extensive litigation in Canada and the United States arising from a contractual dispute between the two groups. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:22 pm by The Charge
  One dissenting judge even declared, We are told by our national leaders that a state of emergency now exists throughout the world-that our liberties are in jeopardy-that to preserve those liberties we must unite with other free nations of the world in establishing the most potent military force of all time to resist totalitarian aggression. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Shamnad Basheer
 It is pertinent to note that the United States contains only a “fair use” or fair dealing provision and not a separate “educational instruction” exception. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
How does a person acquire the status of legal parent, with the substantial rights and obligations that come with the title? [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
LEAVES TO APPEAL GRANTED Aboriginal Law: Title Is there aboriginal title and a right to harvest here.William, et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
In almost all cases where punitive damages are awarded, the defendant must have acted intentionally, maliciously, or with complete disregard for the rights and interests of the plaintiff. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am by Anubha Sinha
Gopika brought to our attention a press release issued by IPXI, Intellectual Property Exchange International, Inc., the world's first financial exchange for licensing and trading intellectual property rights,the eight month long review of IPXI conducted by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice in this post. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am by VALL Blog Master
All academic, general, and professional audiences. -- V. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:18 pm by Aparajita Lath
The couple had assigned all the rights in their personality to the plaintiff for use in the advertisements in all media, including print and video. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:06 pm by Florian Mueller
At the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) Nokia has just defeated Google and HTC with respect to the proper legal interpretation of U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
Basically, the owner of a copyrighted product can do with it what he or she wishes, other than copy it or infringe moral rights or break TPMs, where applicable.The decision applies to all copies lawfully made anywhere – whether the product is a book, a chocolate bar, a wrist watch, a plane, train or automobile. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm by Mike Madison
In section 602, “work” in this context [Importation into the United States, without the authority of the owner of copyright under this title, of copies or phonorecords of a work that have been acquired outside the United States is an infringement of the exclusive right to distribute copies or phonorecords under section 106, actionable under section 501."] has to mean “original work of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of… [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Target sold 140 Bruce Lee t-shirts in California, while Urban Outfitters sold 4,980 shirts California and elsewhere in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The court held that in order to pursue a securities claim in connection with a transaction in non-exchange securities, the claimant has to allege either “irrevocable liability was incurred or title transferred within the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am by Ken
In my post about Prenda Law's defamation lawsuits, I mentioned that Prenda is facing an inquiry by United States District Judge Otis Wright in Los Angeles. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 12:46 pm by Larry
In this case, it comes from the Eleventh Circuit, with a special guest appearance from the Court of International Trade.The case is United States v. [read post]