Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 1701 - 1720 of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm by Florian Mueller
The FTC has filed the following complaint with the the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (this post continues below the document): 17-01-17 FTC Complaint v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm's amicus curiae brief filed with the Federal Circuit in the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 2:53 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
(the “Debtor”) and certain of its affiliated entities[1] (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 2:53 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
(the “Debtor”) and certain of its affiliated entities[1] (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Sundara Rajan, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Glasgow, depicts a fascinating drama in which the principal actors are two literary ladies and, making a relatively rare appearance centre stage, the United States Postal Service. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
He had come to the United States from the Phillipines as a child in 1974, and has resided here since then. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
Oct. 21, 2020): “because the infringing act of downloading the material occurred on a computer outside the United States, there was no act in the United States to establish jurisdiction” * Donat v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am by Florian Mueller
As the great Rush Limbaugh said a few years ago:"George Soros' objective is to agitate and vibrate the United States into a crumbling state of disrepair. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:46 pm by Alex Young
  The court held that the respondents’ conduct negatively affected their fellow unit holders and the condominium corporation and was therefore oppressive and unfairly prejudicial. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:46 pm by Alex Young
  The court held that the respondents’ conduct negatively affected their fellow unit holders and the condominium corporation and was therefore oppressive and unfairly prejudicial. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
The New York Times recently published a pair of scathing articles about the state of arbitration in the United States. [read post]