Search for: "WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS" Results 1701 - 1720 of 4,153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2016, 6:47 am by Jim Sedor
Florida – Bryant Miller Olive Appeals $50 Fine – and LosesFlorida Politics – Jim Rosica | Published: 6/3/2016 The Bryant Miller Olive law firm lost its appeal of a $50 fine for the late filing of one of its lobbyist compensation reports in Florida. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 11:00 pm
The DOE's and DOJ's interpretation of Title IX is consistent with agency treatment of gender identity under both Title VII and Title IX, but it is important to note that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (of which Wisconsin is a part) has not yet provided definitive guidance relating to the interpretation of these federal laws. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 11:00 pm
The DOE's and DOJ's interpretation of Title IX is consistent with agency treatment of gender identity under both Title VII and Title IX, but it is important to note that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (of which Wisconsin is a part) has not yet provided definitive guidance relating to the interpretation of these federal laws. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:23 am by Timothy D. Tremba
On May 26, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Lewis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 12:34 pm by Taylor E. Whitten
Late last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (covering Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin) went against the prevailing federal court tides and concluded that class action waivers in mandatory arbitration clauses are unenforceable. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Chaudhuri (Indian Lands – Restricted Fee Status) Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.html Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:01 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Chaudhuri (Indian Lands - Restricted Fee Status)Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.html Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:25 pm by Bridget Crawford
 The Collapse of the House that Ruth Built: The Impact of the Feeder System on Female Judges and the Federal Judiciary, 1970-2014 Panelist: Alexandra Hess, Law Clerk, Second Circuit Court of Appeals Commentator: Victor Quintanilla 3. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
However, the district court denied the motion, and the employer appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
29 May 2016, 6:14 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Plaintiff’s only recourse at that point was to appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which granted review. [read post]
29 May 2016, 6:14 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Plaintiff’s only recourse at that point was to appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which granted review. [read post]
28 May 2016, 3:04 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
On interlocutory appeal, Brian argued the overly broad restrictive covenants invalidated his entire employment contract, therefore the trial court erred by enforcing any part of it, even granting narrower injunctive relief. [read post]
28 May 2016, 3:04 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
On interlocutory appeal, Brian argued the overly broad restrictive covenants invalidated his entire employment contract, therefore the trial court erred by enforcing any part of it, even granting narrower injunctive relief. [read post]
27 May 2016, 7:21 am by Russell Cawyer
In a recent Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals panel opinion, the court of appeals covering Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin, held that individual arbitration agreement containing class-action waivers were not enforceable. [read post]
25 May 2016, 9:49 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals on Tuesday stayed [order, PDF] a lower court's decision striking down Wisconsin's "right to work" law [text]. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:52 pm by David Kopel
The only such lawsuit that succeeded was in Maryland, where the Court of Appeals (the state’s highest court) ruled in favor of a lawsuit against manufacturers of “Saturday night specials. [read post]