Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 1721 - 1740 of 112,757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm by David Walk
Although this case does not involve a drug or a device, several rulings should prove useful to lawyers who handle drug and device cases. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 10:03 am by Justin P. Webb
Because the copyright holder initially knows the putative defendants only by their IP addresses, it identifies the defendants anonymously in the complaint as John Does. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:08 am by Ray Beckerman
In a group of Oregon cases brought by plaintiff Voltage Pictures against more than 600 "Doe" defendants, the Court has ordered plaintiff to show cause why the cases should not be severed. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:31 am by Eugene Volokh
[Plaintiff] David [Brast] and [Defendant] Randy [Brast] are brothers and neighbors, and [Defendant] Ryan [Brast] is Randy's son. [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:28 pm by Joe Suhre
  Disposed Does Not Equal Expungement Even when a case is disposed of, this does not mean it has been expunged from your record. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:16 am
  In particular, Judge Batts wrote:The Complaint does not claim, for instance, that when typed into the address bar, any of the five domain names at issue directs visitors to Defendants' commercial website. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:35 pm by TJ McIntyre
The key passage is at para. 4 of the judgment and neatly summarises why very few posts will attract a duty of confidence:[A]nyone who uses Facebook  does so at his or her peril. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 2:10 pm by Steve Lash
Defendants sued for allegedly converting money held in escrow to unauthorized uses cannot defend themselves by claiming the escrow funds had been validly commingled with other accounts, Maryland’s second highest court has held. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:11 am by The Legal Blog
 (c) If the Defendant discloses such facts as may be deemed sufficient to entitle him to defend, that is to say, although the affidavit does not positively and immediately make it clear that he has a defence, yet, shews such a state of facts as leads to the inference that at the trial of the action he may be able to establish a defence to the plaintiff's claim the Plaintiff is not entitled to judgment and the Defendant is entitled to leave to… [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:02 am
Spalding sued defendant (ARBICO) for false advertising of its fly control products under the Lanham Act. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:56 pm by admin
Merely driving fast and weaving in and out of traffic does not qualify as Reckless Driving. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant does not claim such a privilege applied to her testimony in this case, and none did. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:17 pm
The fact that his criminal impersonations were discovered prior to any completed sexual acts, does not affect the significance of the history of the defendant's criminal behavior. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Kenan Farrell
Defendant “TNutz” is allegedly representing through its eBay store that numerous products being offered for sale are 80/20 products when they are not. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 5:29 pm
Does 1-5, a case in the Western District of Michigan targeting students at Northern Michigan University, the Magistrate Judge has denied reconsideration of his decision denying the motion by pro se defendant John Doe #5 to quash the RIAA's subpoena.December 2, 2008, Order of Magistrate Judge denying motion for reconsideration*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->-->… [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 9:24 am by Diane Polscer
 Since the primary policy directly under RLI had no duty to defend because of an exclusion and RLI did not establish the applicability of other policies for its policy period, RLI’s duty to defend was triggered. [read post]
Russia’s delegate argued that the right to self-defense does not extend to commercial shipping and emphasized the importance of freedom of navigation under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:39 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
” Thus, Maryland’s dead man statute is slightly different from Virginia’s in that it does not provide for the categorical admission of statements made by the dead. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
This duty, however, does not arise where the civil action or proceeding is brought by or on behalf of the State.The State’s duty to defend or indemnify and save harmless the individual is subject to the following conditions:: 1. [read post]