Search for: "Doe 1-8" Results 1721 - 1740 of 32,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2013, 5:43 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 41.50(b), we enter a new ground of rejection for claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 7:53 pm by Carrie Cordero
#debate /1 Does he have actual info revealing why the USIC is wrong? [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:47 am by Romano Beitsma
"Page 13, lines 2 to 13"Special cover modules for defining the visual impression of the medication delivery device are shown 7, 8, 9. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:06 pm by Mark Theodore
 Thus, the confidentiality language does not specifically reference and restrict information concerning and their jobs. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The BGI singles them out and therefore directly identifies them for the purposes of section 1(1)(a) of the DPA…”. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 1:30 am by Anna Maria Stein
The trade mark consists of a double circular line on the upper portion of which is a stylized butterfly: Relying on a likelihood of confusion  pursuant to Art. 8(1)(b) EUTMR and on protection of a trade mark with a reputation according to Art. 8(5) EUTMR, Italian fashion company Cris Conf S.p.A. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:16 am by David DePaolo
I doubt it...In the New Mexico case the justices cite a DoJ memorandum that pretty much summarizes what is of concern to the federal government - getting pot into the wrong hands, doing anything with it on federal land or creating a public nuisance or danger.The memo lists 8 areas "of concern" to the DoJ:(1) Preventing the distribution of marijuana to minors;(2) Preventing revenue from the sale of marijuana from going to criminal enterprises, gangs, and cartels;(3)… [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 1:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(collectively“ScriptPro”) appeal the United States District Court forthe District of Kansas’s grant of summary judgment thatclaims 1, 2, 4, and 8 (“asserted claims”) of U.S. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:54 am by Derek T. Muller
In an 8-1 decision, the Court upheld the fines.The Court opens by acknowledging that presidential electors perform a “federal function. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 11:45 am by John Enser
 So the Dutch court's approach seems to be that the exceptions set out in the Directive apply to a broad range of databases, even beyond those which are granted IP protection by the Directive.They therefore asked the CJEU the following question (and thanks to EU Law Radar's Stephen Vousden for the informal translation)Does the scope of the Database Directive also cover online databases that are neither protected in copyright under Chapter II of the Directive nor protected as a sui… [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
[8] As to the first question, in the simple case where drawings are referred to in the description but no drawings are filed, the answer will clearly be yes. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm by ADaigle
1)  An intent to redeem must be filed within 8 days after a sale and often times the sale of a lien by an association doesn't become viable until after the sale date. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:11 am by Lauren Ellerman
Sometimes you will need to share these concerns in writing - verbal communication may not get very far.8. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:30 pm by WIMS
President Obama and most Democrats support the extension; however, candidate Romney's campaign has indicated its desire to let the PTC expire at the end of the year [See WIMS 8/1/12]. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 8:24 am by Eugene Volokh
(The en banc vote was as close as it could be—an 8-8 tie, which goes against the petitioner.) [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:25 pm by Bruce Carton
Here are today's three burning legal questions, along with the answers provided by the blogosphere. 1. [read post]