Search for: "Downs v. USA"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 1,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1-1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
Hickman identifies three areas of deficiency in the amendments: The Lords did not vote down Part 2 of the Bill (which contains the CMP provisions) – and rejected a proposed amendment that would have had this effect; The Lords did not include an amendment that would require a balancing exercise (the interests of justice in disclosure and a fair trial vs. national security demanding secrecy) to be performed in respect of whether each piece of evidence should be made… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
There have been so many decisions in this dispute between the parties, in, for example the USA, Germany, and the Netherlands (and this is without considering any of the patent issues, or issues relating to mobile phones as opposed to tablet computers), that it is easy to forget that all of the decisions so far, at both first instance and appeal, have been about whether to grant interim/interlocutory injunctions, and about procedural issues. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:06 pm
Gehen Sie zu website und setzen Sie down Ihre eigenen Qualifikationen. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm
That changed in 2004, when a unanimous Supreme Court strongly affirmed its support for a balanced approach to copyright law and in the process breathed new life into the Copyright Act’s fair dealing provision in a case called Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:06 am
Earlier this year, it was referenced in the hearings at the International Court of Justice for the case of South Africa v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
There have been so many decisions in this dispute between the parties, in, for example the USA, Germany, and the Netherlands (and this is without considering any of the patent issues, or issues relating to mobile phones as opposed to tablet computers), that it is easy to forget that all of the decisions so far, at both first instance and appeal, have been about whether to grant interim/interlocutory injunctions, and about procedural issues. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
There have been so many decisions in this dispute between the parties, in, for example the USA, Germany, and the Netherlands (and this is without considering any of the patent issues, or issues relating to mobile phones as opposed to tablet computers), that it is easy to forget that all of the decisions so far, at both first instance and appeal, have been about whether to grant interim/interlocutory injunctions, and about procedural issues. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Greenberg Senior Fellow for China Studies, Council on Foreign Relations (Testimony)· Joel Wuthnow, Research Fellow, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, National Defense University (Testimony)· Daniel Kliman, Senior Fellow, Asia-Pacific Security Program, Center for a New American Security (Testimony)1:00 PM – 2:00… [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
Pix: Texwinca Holdings LtdOn 6 June 2018, the Council on Ethics recommended to exclude the company Texwinca Holdings Ltd from the Government Pension Fund due to an unacceptable risk of the company being responsible for systematic human rights violations.Texwinca is a Chinese company that produces yarn, knitted fabrics and garments. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:12 pm
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Republican Governors Gave Lucrative, No-Bid COVID-19 Deals to Utah Firms, Who Then Gave $1M to GOP Campaigns Yahoo News – Craig Harris, Bailey Schulz, and Katie Wedell (USA Today) | Published: 7/27/2022 A small number of companies leveraged their connections to sign deals to provide COVID-19 tests and personal protective equipment that would pay them at least $219 million in five GOP-led states. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
I. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:14 pm
I have discussed the reform with members of Congress and it has been debated in prior years.2004... 2002... this is post-Bush v. [read post]
