Search for: "Edwards v. Means" Results 1721 - 1740 of 1,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Gideon
Second, we have proposed legislation in Florida, via the 13th juror, that seeks to make attacks against the homeless a hate crime: Senate and House committees approved legislation that would make prejudice-driven attacks against the homeless a hate crime, meaning longer jail sentences for offenders. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:37 am by Susan Brenner
The case this post deals with is a federal case, which means that Rule 901 of the Federal Rules of Evidence governed the process of authenticating evidence. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
The requirement to investigate does not depend on a complaint from the victim or next-of-kin: once the matter has come to the attention of the authorities they must act of their own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
The case of Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
That means elevating buildings, making taller and stronger dams and seawalls, rerouting water systems, restricting certain developments, changing farming practices, and ultimately moving people, plants, and animals out of harm’s way. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:35 pm
Brian Hall notes that Facebook has announced new privacy controls and what it means from an employment standpoint. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 When I was a young boy, they used to say: "What's good for General Motors is good for this country. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
/Apr. 2004] concerning the outcome of Eldred v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:36 pm
 See, Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated [2009] EWHC 1304 (Pat) (12 June 2009). [read post]