Search for: "HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, a corporation" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/7hcq4d166P -> Anti-spam law adds exceptions, delayed until 2014 http://t.co/zgHeReUBeT -> Quebec startup offers help to prepare for new <b>anti-spam laws</b> http://t.co/1vYgFcxzz0 -> Angelina Jolie’s stunt double sues News Corp. for alleged hacking http://t.co/FRSyiGnuHe -> Google Asks to Make Surveillance Orders Public, Citing First Amendment http://t.co/wNn5r009R8 -> Broad internet safe harbor is causing real harm says expert http://t.co/LbdkdCUDfj… [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 8:16 am by Anubha Sinha
You can read more about the intrusive surveillance measures here.The international organisation Human Rights Watch (HRW) and WikiLeaks recently expressed their horror over CMS’s blatant violation of privacy and free expression. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
He has served as Acting Chief Operating Officer and Corporate Secretary for the Goldman Sachs Foundation and has held senior level legal positions with Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris Companies Inc., Philip Morris Management Corporation, Kraft Foods, Inc. and General Foods Corporation. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:49 am
The UN Guiding Principles reflect the up to date most authoritative expression of the existing international consensus on this issue-area, as reflected in the overall support to the principles by States, companies and international civil society actors at large. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamentalists also believe that legal rules can and do shape human and corporate conduct. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:58 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Ramsey told WKYC-TV, “I’m American and I’m a human being, I’m just like you, I work for a living. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:58 am by Bill Marler
Given these new realities, how can we manage risk in a free society? [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:18 pm
The American Society of International Law and the American Branch of the International Law Association have issued a call for proposals for a joint conference, which will comprise the 108th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law and the 76th Biennial Conference of the International Law Association. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:49 am by Terry Hart
If, for the sake of convenience of companies or societies or governments, the copyright law forces individual authors back into a collective straitjacket or makes them into human writing machines, it will indeed have become a tool of the devil. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:36 am by Helena Haapio
The information is layered: there is what the authors call the traditional Legal Code (the “lawyer readable” version), the Commons Deed (the “human readable” version, acting as a user-friendly interface to the Legal Code), and the “machine readable” version of the license. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:27 pm by Aurelia J. Schultz
  It focuses solely on the benefits to society. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:26 am
 But it's important to remember that every act of bullying has a human being at each end of it. [read post]
12 May 2013, 1:00 pm by Kenneth Anderson
The current set of conflicts may prove to be the most heavily litigated in human history. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:01 am by Kit Case
  That connection gives us the power to effect change in the working conditions of the Bangladeshi factories by insisting that American corporations purchase garments for sale in the US from safety-inspected factories that meet minimal international standards for basic worker protection. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am by INFORRM
On Monday 22 April 2013, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights held, by nine votes to eight, that the UK’s ban on political advertising on television did not violate Article 10. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:06 am by Cormac Early
” In a follow-up post at Dorf on Law, he also argues that “Kiobel may not prove so ruinous for human rights litigation in the U.S. courts” for another reason – it did not “cut back on the power of U.S. courts to recognize international law as federal common law” under Article III. [read post]