Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 1721 - 1740 of 3,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2014, 10:41 am by Jason Rantanen
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Ritika Singh
Josh Gerstein of Politico has more on the status of the shield law in Congress. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
” In CTS Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:43 pm
 The Big Yellow Van v Rayner, a ruling of Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court for England and Wales on 27 May, is one of those little judgments that never makes the law reports and doesn't find its way on to BAILII, not least because it appears to have been delivered extempore. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am by Tara Hofbauer
The Supreme Court reached a decision in Bond v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The petitions are Commil USA v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:51 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the story for this blog; other coverage comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today and from Robert Barnes and Mark Berman of The Washington Post, while Rick Hasen discusses the case and the Court’s order at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
21 May 2014, 12:03 pm by Benjamin Wittes
And Title V does the same with various national security letter statutes, thereby preventing any of these laws from being used for bulk collection. [read post]
19 May 2014, 11:01 am by Lyle Denniston
  In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
  This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
17 May 2014, 12:00 am
I’ve often wondered if he left the law because he could not cut it.But his work with Edward Snowden makes me a fan. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:23 am by Stewart Baker
  The Federal Circuit cites “Tale of Two Cities” but others may find Jarndyce v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
” At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses M&G Polymers USA v. [read post]