Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 15,738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2021, 4:42 am
Where do you start if you’re in the TPR? [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
" I thought it would be fun, therefore, to (re?) [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 6:24 am
Because affiliation confusion is actionable, this confusion could be legally significant. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:30 am
Image by Alexas_Fotos from Pixabay The saga continues following new rules prohibiting federal contractors from conducting certain types of diversity training. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
The judgment continued: “Such were the Burges font in Re St Peter’s, Draycott, [2009] Fam 93; the Oldrid Scott chancel screen in Duffield; and the Flemish armet in In re St Lawrence, Wootton [2014] Arches Court. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:29 pm
" This rule is clear. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 7:37 am
The orders include several limitations on their scope and effect, but overall they’re very wide-reaching. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:12 pm
You may have heard from Legal Blog Watch (here and here) that we're giving a Golden Asshole Award once a month to the individual making the greatest contribution to reducing assholishness in the [legal] profession. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:59 am
The post continues:"Following the major recruitment campaign in 2016 for judicial positions (both legal and technical) of the UPC, the Preparatory Committee has agreed to re-open recruitment for judicial positions to new applications.Given it has been three years since the last campaign, it is now right to call for new applications. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:24 pm
In other words, because the domicile address rule does not itself change the substantive legal criteria for granting or denying trademarks, the court sees it as merely a procedural step in the application process. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:30 am
The fresh ruling in December 2016 issued by the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC) on the “Michael Jordan” 4+ years legal battle has attracted great attention (see a Guest Kat report here). [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
” A recent empirical study, for example, highlighted the relative effectiveness of auditory alarms in re-engaging inattentive drivers.[10] Advances in this direction continued to develop increasingly complex alarm systems.[11] The coupling of intelligent “alarms” that continuously monitor and account for live conditions of the road and alert drivers accordingly must be weighed against the explicit, written rules of the road. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:56 pm
We’re in the midst of a medical emergency — and we’re in the midst of a legal emergency. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:13 am
I'm sure you're now aware of the current Federal Administration's continued hostility toward the LGBT community. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:23 pm
In April, the patent office issued a preliminary ruling rejecting the patents, but the university is exercising its right to appeal.The USPTO issued first Office Actions in the re-exam of the three patents, AND WARF made responses to these first Office Actions, as is routinely done in re-examinations. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 6:16 pm
The Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that Wayfair Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:29 pm
” Look for a detailed analysis of that ruling and its implications here soon. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:12 am
’” Noting the court’s Wal-Mart ruling, AAJ President Gibson Vance said “ordinary employees and consumers will have no legal remedy if they cannot band together in a class-action claim. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:43 am
Such a ruling would prohibit the use of remote drop off sites statewide. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:55 pm
Your blog might be “not directed primarily at a legal audience,” but when you poke a good lawyer with your ethics schtick you’re going to get a legal audience, and unlike your non-legal audience they’re going to see that you’re all hat and no cattle. [read post]
