Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 2,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
Given the division of medical opinion in the treating clinicians, it was both reasonable and a proper exercise of judgment as to what was in TTM’s best interests to use medical practitioners who came to TTM’s case afresh. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:44 am
I find it interesting that only two states have done this, so far, anyway. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:57 pm
(Father’s) (Mother’s) health insurance premiums allocated for the child(ren): d. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
Justice SinghviThe Supreme Court in Ghisalal vs Dhapubai (D) By Lrs. has examined the provisions of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act relating to adoption. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:06 am
I denied his request and he responded: "Fine, you black b$%@*&! [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:42 pm
If the child comes home with a B on the test, some Western parents will still praise the child. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:02 pm
§ 615 (f)(3)(B). see, 34 CFR §300.511(d); 71 Fed. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
If the child comes home with a B on the test, some Western parents will still praise the child. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
(When item b is absent, a parent can’t lose full custody of a child simply because some other arrangement is in the child’s best interests; the standard for loss of full custody would be unfitness on the parent’s part.) [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:09 am
I found the use of the statute here interesting. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:02 am
--The following were extended through the end of 2012: (1) the $1,000 child tax credit, the employer-provided child care tax credit and the American Opportunity Tax Credit (for education), (2) the improvements to the adoption tax credit, earned income tax credit and dependent care tax credit, (3) the employee tax exclusion, and the employer tax deduction, (in each case up to $5,250) for employer-provided educational assistance, and (4) the annual $2000 contribution limit for… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm
Eq. 297, 299 (Ch. 1939) aff'd o.b., 128 N.J. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:30 pm
For your interest, here's a look at some of the popular legal topics on JD Supra during 2010. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:25 pm
According to Article 23 b, “a judgment relating to parental responsibility shall not be recognised if it was given (…) without the child having been given an opportunity to be heard. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm
The Tryons refused to take part in the family report process (where a psychologist or social worker interviews the family to assess what is in the best interests of the child) without having their lawyer present. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:37 am
And there’s an interesting twist to Pepper v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
And it’s very interesting, a very interesting phenomenon. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Kroop, Craig D. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:48 pm
”“Imagine getting a B in that class as opposed to a C,” Miyake said. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:53 pm
B. [read post]
