Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 1721 - 1740 of 88,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2024, 8:07 am
I understand that different people -- and different cultures -- may have varying approaches to the issue.Nonetheless, personally, I wouldn't want to be the individual remembered by history as one who filed a federal lawsuit and fought hard in an attempt to make cockfighting legal in the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands.Particularly since he loses. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The legal interest that those parties have in common must be identical (or nearly identical), as opposed to merely similar” (Hyatt v State of Cal. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am by Jocelyn Hutton
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is not often that a court allows reargument, states that it misapplied the law, and reverses itself as took place in Orlando v Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene  Genovese & Gluck, P.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:47 pm by The Complex Litigator
(2) Does Evidence Code section 915 prohibit a trial court from conducting an in camera review of a legal opinion letter to determine whether the attorney-client privilege protects facts stated in the letter? [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 1:58 pm by Martin H. Orlick
In a unanimous published opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit) affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of Whitaker v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:11 pm
Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't, with introductory note by Valentina AzarovICSID: Micula et al. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 3:18 pm
Brief of Washington Legal Foundation, as Aimcus Curiae Supporting Appellant, United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Plaintiff's remaining causes of action against the firm, for negligent misrepresention and tortious interference, are dismissed as redundant of the legal malpractice claim (see Shwartz v Olshan Grundman Frome & Rosenzweig, 302 AD2d 193 [2003]; Reyes v Leuzzi, 2005 NY Misc LEXIS 2914, *3, 2005 WL 3501578, *4; cf. [read post]