Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 4,050
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
In particular, the Council referred to the obiter words of Lord Woolf MR in Broadmoor Special Hospital Authority v Robinson [2000] QB 775: “if a public body is given a statutory responsibility which it is required to perform in the public interest, then, in the absence of an implication to the contrary in the statute, it has standing to apply to the court for an injunction to prevent interference with its performance of its public responsibilities and the courts should grant… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
But what did Lord Wilson actually say? [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
As stated in North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 he ‘is not an insurer against all hazards’. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Mance, however, did state that although this was an inappropriate case in which to decide the proper approach to the defence of illegality, there was a need for review of the law of illegality by the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
Mrs Braganza appealed to the Supreme Court, and the appeal was heard on 10 November 2014 by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:17 am
Supreme Court Appeal On 2 February 2015 the trustee’s appeal was heard before Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am
Her predominant legal interest lies in the areas of state crime and international human rights. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:35 am
It reads like this: I AM the LORD thy God. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:05 am
Lord Neuberger stated that it seemed wrong in principle that through the grant of planning permission, a planning authority should be able to deny a property-owner the right to object to what would otherwise be a nuisance, without providing compensation. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am
The majority contrasted the case at hand with ECHR cases such as Üner v Netherlands and X v Austria where the ECHR had considered the best interests of the child in determining the proportionality of an interference with parents’ rights under article 8 alone and article 8 combined with article 14. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am
Lady Hale and Lord Toulson had no such qualms. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson on 18 and 19 March 2015. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
v=n83m1ZbclBs&feature=youtu.be Follow @azatty [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am
They cite Lord Nicholls in Douglas v Hello 3 (OBG v Allan) as clearly stating that the concept of breach of confidence and misuse of private information “now covers two distinct causes of action”. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:46 am
The lawfulness of the cap was addressed by the Supreme Court in R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
In a lengthy dissenting judgment, Lord Justice Sales disagreed with the application of the defence stating that the difference between his view and that of the majority was that he considered greater weight should be given to the rights of the trade mark owner and the protection of the interests of the relevant public. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm
Alternatively, Article 8 rights were engaged, as the tenants would be unable to remain in their existing accommodation, as per Lord Dyson (MR) in R (JS) v Secretary of Sta [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
Lord Denning in Miller v Jackson Also in the 1970s, English judge Lord Denning wrote one of his most famous judgments in a case that involved a dispute over cricket balls being hit out of a village cricket ground onto a neighboring property. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
The sentence was quashed this week after the Lord Chief Justice found that the trial judge had misdirected the jury on a key aspect of the offence. [read post]
