Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2022, 10:38 am
The pending appeal before the Supreme court of the United States is styled Susan K. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:09 pm
Morris of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a notable opinion in the case of Rosenberg v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:58 am
“A mark is famous if it is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
16 May 2008, 4:15 am
Newcomer Barilla had become the highest selling brand of pasta in the United States by the early 2000s, which motivated Barilla to seek registration of the subject mark. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:57 pm
United Airlines, 550 So.2d 134, 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); General Elec. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm
See, North Dakota v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Some of these activities spill over into the United States, and just in 2020, three men were arrested in Texas transporting illicit cigarettes. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
United States argument 3/1/2010 Kiyemba v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2005, 7:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:15 am
Unique Motorcars v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:36 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:07 am
In today’s connected world, infringers can take advantage of U.S. commerce from outside the United States. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:40 am
Global Traffic Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the third party derivative suit pursuant to Fed. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
