Search for: "Matter of David B." Results 1721 - 1740 of 3,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:59 am by William Ford, Elliot Setzer
David Berger, the commandant of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm by Ray Dowd
Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 12.11[B][3], at 12-208 (2005).[2] Darden does not contest the general applicability of the APA to his claim; indeed, he expressly brought this action under the APA. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 3:03 pm
It seems obvious that this is not a legitimate concern given the House's power to appoint its own counsel in such matters. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 8:20 pm by Daniel B. Cohen
” Subpart D covers a multitude of sins, including Class A sewage sludge, the cream of the crop, and Class B sewage sludge, the bottom of the barrel, so to speak. [read post]
The result of this invidious doctrine, as formulated in Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168, meant that “if two people set out to commit an offence (crime A), and in the course of that joint enterprise, one of them (D1) commits another offence (crime B), the second person (D2) is guilty as an accessory to crime B if he has foreseen the possibility that D1 might act as he did. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:06 am by Moria Miller
There has to be an actor who can and will step in,” Jacoby said.Professors David Skeel, David Reiss, Jason S. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:01 am by Jan von Hein
Peter Mankowski, International Jurisdiction in Insurance Matters: Professional Lessor as Injured Party and Standardized, not Case-by-case Assessment of Need of Protection The injured party can sue its opponent’s liability insurer at its own domicile under Art. 11 II in conjunction with Art. 9 I lit. b Brussels I Regulation/Art. 13 II in conjunction with Art. 11 I lit. b Brussels Ibis Regulation. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:40 am by Shea Denning
Evid. 404(b) to show that the Charlotte theft was part of a common scheme. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:04 am by Russell Jackson
First up is the new book Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy (Oxford 2011), by Mark Herrmann and David B. [read post]