Search for: "Mr. X" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
  Lord Rodger said: “Article 8 and reputation 37           On behalf of the press, Mr Robertson QC did not dispute that article 8 rights fall within the scope of “the rights of others” in article 10(2). [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:31 pm by emagraken
 In doing so the Court repeated the following very useful quote from Mr. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm by INFORRM
  The matter was heard on 15 October 2010, the return date of an injunction granted shortly before midnight on 13 October 2010, by Mr Justice Nicol. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 2:32 pm by Barry Knobel
” I remembered the caption in that classic cartoon of an attorney speaking with his client – “You’ve got a good case, Mr. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:29 am
If and to the extent that Mr Scott’s case is that there can be no infringement under s.60(2) unless there is actual direct infringement, it is plainly wrong. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am by INFORRM
On 11 September 2010, Mr Justice Treacy had granted an emergency interim injunction and had made an order anonymising “X”. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am by INFORRM
   He contended that X was clearly a public figure – having appeared in a large numbers of TV films and having talked about his drug related crimes in other media. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:11 am by Mandelman
Tax fraud, tax evasion, securities fraud, a fraud on the courts, a Ponzi scheme of Herculean proportion, the unqualified failure of our government’s regulatory and enforcement agencies… the money long gone to bankers in the form of mega-bonuses… and a group of Wall Street bankers confident that Congress will simply white wash over everything (read: socialize the debt) and send the bill to the American people. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:40 am by Intelligent Challenge
For example, “if we hire Mr X, will it hurt company Y? [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:53 am by Brent Lorentz
 For X-Files, there’s the X-Philes. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:00 am by Eilionoir Flynn
Related PostsSeptember 22, 2010 -- California Introduces New Law to Combat Discrimination Against Parents with Disabilities (0)August 28, 2010 -- The X Factor a Format for Exploitation and Exclusion? [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Updated x 2 | Kay and Others v United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights, 21st September) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that the UK violated the human rights of short-term tenants of council property whose leases had been terminated. [read post]