Search for: "P. v. Hard" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2011, 8:28 pm by Michael O'Hear
    One can’t help but think of California’s race-based segregation of inmates, which was found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court just a few years ago in Johnson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:45 am by Milen Hristov
As I wrote before, developers are playing hard with this matter and sometimes lie about what common parts are owned by them and owners. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 1:26 pm by Ron
Kevin says that what is hard to think about in legal market is commonplace in most industries. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm by Michael O'Hear
If, therefore, analysis is impossible for harmless-error purposes, then it is hard to see how it would be possible for purposes of Strickland prejudice—after all, prejudice is the central inquiry in a harmless error inquiry. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:45 pm by The Legal Blog
The difference between exhaustive and inclusive definitions has been explained in P. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
[P]eople often debate whether the law should be aimed at efficiency or at justice. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
The issue is the 'turf wars' between local government and national government (via NASS as was) that sprang up after the judgment in R v City of Westminster and others ex p M, P, A and X [Ex p. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
The issue is the 'turf wars' between local government and national government (via NASS as was) that sprang up after the judgment in R v City of Westminster and others ex p M, P, A and X [Ex p. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Often p sues and d defaults. [read post]