Search for: "People v. Method"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 4,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2016, 5:40 pm
” Shepherd v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
Luxco, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
The Court held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil service commission becomes and is the actual appointing power" [People v Mosher, 163 NY 32]. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The rule of three was ruled valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 7:24 am
The other two were Zarda v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The rule of three was ruled valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The Court held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil service commission becomes and is the actual appointing power" [People v Mosher, 163 NY 32]. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:33 pm
Justice Alito with opinion in Ocasio v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:39 am
Circumstantial evidence is a pretty ordinary method of proving things whether in a criminal case, racial discrimination case or many others. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
Riddell, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm
Cos. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
The reason for that omission is that none of the alleged originalists on the Court uses that method of constitutional interpretation unless it supports their views. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 8:02 am
Gorsuch authored the Court’s 2019 opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm
Hasty, otherwise known as Turkman v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:52 pm
AereoFox v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 6:05 pm
But Roe v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 10:20 pm
Take the recent unpublished case of People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:32 pm
The action (VS Technologies v. [read post]
