Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 1,949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2021, 7:01 am
., People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm
Finally, a quick sampling of some opponents of SESTA-FOSTA (what I call the “Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA”) in its current form: * the Department of Justice * the Wall Street Journal * the Los Angeles Times * the House Liberty Caucus More SESTA/FOSTA-Related Posts: * Can the ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’ Be Salvaged? [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:41 pm
Clarke, R (on the application of) v Cardiff University [2009] EWHC 2148 (Admin) was a judicial review of Cardiff University Law School brought by a BVC student from 2004/5, Ms Clarke. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:45 am
And even if they were to allow such a cognitive maneuver, most people, and even judges, cannot map practical certainty, or something like “beyond a reaonable doubt” on to a probability scale of 0 to 1. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm
For this reason, we cannot consider the incidence proportion or the incidence rate among exposed people to measure a causal effect. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
When examining whether mass surveillance measures are necessary and proportionate under Article 8 ECHR, the European Court of Human Rights has focused its review on whether appropriate safeguards against government abuse exist.While the Court has not recently carried out a balancing exercise between the benefits sought by mass surveillance and its impact on society, the Grand Chamber judgment from S. and Marper v. the U.K., a case in which the Court found unanimously that the collection and… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:30 am
At People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:46 am
Linking two fingerprints required manual comparison of an unknown scene sample with, for instance, the 23 million criminal cards on file with the FBI.'The 1980s, however, initiated a period of rapid change. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:47 am
"Via Walter Reaves, comes word of Mechell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm
The people who need it the most just don’t show up. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
More SESTA-Related Posts: * Debunking Some Myths About Section 230 and Sex Trafficking (Guest Blog Post) * Congress Is About To Ruin Its Online Free Speech Masterpiece (Cross-Post) * Backpage Executives Must Face Money Laundering Charges Despite Section 230–People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 6:53 am
Dockless Bikes v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm
As I did with the Bill of Rights Commission consultation, I asked people to send me their consultation responses. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm
See "District Court Analysis v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:17 am
Hands-on research - directly sampling Fat Ba$tard’s ‘evidence. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 12:57 pm
Use Images Correctly: Fair use, as per the Perfect 10 v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
P., V. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
(Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:21 am
FTC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
KIND LLC v. [read post]
