Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 1721 - 1740 of 3,526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:06 pm by John Marshall
The issue was, however, revisited under New Jersey’s Constitution in State v. [read post]
In a tremendous step forward for our right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Becker Case number: 14-cv-02827 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey) Case filed: May 5, 2014 Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 12, 2014 05/22/2014 08/20/2014 2014-52 SEC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:58 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
This past week, the United States District Court of Eastern District of New York denied Duck Walk’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:24 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
Cottrell also brought a claim under the New Jersey Civil Rights Act (NJCRA), a state law that provides remedies for certain violations of the United States and New Jersey Constitution. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey) (employee had reasonable expectation of privacy in password-protected work computer); Brown–Criscuolo v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 11:02 am by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
In light of the recent decision of the New Jersey Appellate Division in the case of State of New Jersey v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
April 7, 2014 Conaboy, J.), United States Federal Court Judge Richard P. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last year, when the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:51 am by Amy Howe
  He concludes that “the real effect of [United States v.] [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:40 pm by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
A recent decision out of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied an employer’s motion to dismiss a claim of reverse race discrimination, finding the employee had enough evidence to meet this heightened standard. [read post]