Search for: "State v. Square" Results 1721 - 1740 of 6,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (Cleveland State) posted this to a discussion list that I'm on, and graciously allowed me to forward it; it's about today's U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:14 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued July 28, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Rivers v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi; ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis, heard 21-23 July 2015. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:16 am by Heather Whiteman Runs Him
She noted that this is a “common fact pattern” and is consistent with the facts underlying the court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 1:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has vacated the judgment of this Court and remanded this case to us "for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It relied very heavily upon the 1920 precedent in Missouri v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 6:49 am
The police won that suit by relying on police guidelines stating that officers should not fire their weapons when "in their professional judgment, doing so will unnecessarily endanger innocent persons". [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:28 am by Eleonora Rosati
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.The event will now dedicate one of its two panels to a discussion of the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Lidl v Tesco.Starting at 2pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]