Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 8,957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
On review, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that Booking.com is not generic. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
The Docker fee has the effect of preventing poor and destitute American Citizens from access the State and U.S. district Courts, and the United States Supreme Court.( 42 ESC: 1981 Access to the Courts).On 1215 The British's Magna Carter granted to poor English's citizens their Common Law's Rights to access to the Royal Court without paying for their rights under the Magna Carter of 1215. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm
A third notable cert denial came in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am
United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Plaintiff [Petitioner] appealed the decision of the United States Federal District Court's granting summary judgment to Defendants [Respondents] in the action brought by Petitioner in which he had alleged that he had suffered having to work in a hostile work environment in violation of 42 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
Plaintiff [Petitioner] appealed the decision of the United States Federal District Court's granting summary judgment to Defendants [Respondents] in the action brought by Petitioner in which he had alleged that he had suffered having to work in a hostile work environment in violation of 42 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
., Petitioners, v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Post By Tina G Yin-Sowatzke The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is proposing changes to a number of rules applied to post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board). [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:47 am
Mondelēz International, Inc. manufactures and distributes those products by its various family members.Ominously for Retrobrands’ petition, the Board started its discussion by stating that, “CHICLETS branded gum has been sold in the United States continuously by various predecessors-in-interest since around 1900. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 11:25 am
” The CWA defines the term “navigable waters” to mean “waters of the United States, including the territorial seas. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:28 pm
(quoting United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick shares the latest update regarding reopening procedures for United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) field offices nationwide. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
"*** The Appellate Division said that one of the Petitioners had "made clear in her letter of resignation, she had an agreement with [the District] that she would receive the retroactive [salary] payment while retaining the [health insurance] benefits of the old CBA. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
"*** The Appellate Division said that one of the Petitioners had "made clear in her letter of resignation, she had an agreement with [the District] that she would receive the retroactive [salary] payment while retaining the [health insurance] benefits of the old CBA. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas and United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:04 am
The prior rules simply stated that the regional director “shall schedule the election for the earliest date practicable. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 pm
” The CWA defines the term “navigable waters” to mean “waters of the United States, including the territorial seas. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:29 pm
On June 1, the Board issued a public announcement reacting to Judge Jackson’s last minute decision, stating that the Agency believes that “it followed all legal requirements in issuing the December 2019 amendments to its procedural rules” and that it intended “to appeal the Court’s order to the court of appeals once the Court issues it memorandum opinion. [read post]
