Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 1"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 2,513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Criminal law -- Evidence -- Hearsay -- Tape recording -- Trial court did not err in allowing surreptitiously recorded conversation between defendant and co-defendant in the back of a patrol car to be played at trial where defendant's side of conversation was admissible as a party admission and co-defendant's side of conversation was admissible to place defendant's statements into context -- Further,… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
No derogation from articles 6, 7, 8 (paragraphs 1 and 2), 11, 15, 16 and 18 may be made under this provision. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm
Peters represented herself (surely finding her former legal experience a bonus) and Honda was represented by a Technical Specialist (in what is unknown), Mr. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:52 pm
I would also add a couple more reasons that I have received via email (mostly anonymously): 1. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:22 pm
” An ambush in a confined setting of unknown configuration is more to be feared than it is in open, more familiar surroundings. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 8:32 pm
I’m also officially 1-0 on my “real world” trial record! [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The man had previously been denied his seizure medication for unknown reasons. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 11:20 am
When multiple inventors are named on a patent, it's not usually because they all thought of claim 1 at the same time or they were all in the room when the new material was created. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:50 am
While the defendants themselves are unknown to Paul and his team of lawyers, the negative effect of their actions are all too familiar. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:26 am
The Court of Appeals noted, in analyzing it, that a warrantless arrest is justified if the arresting officers had probable cause to believe that the defendant committed a felony. . . . [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm
The implications are clear: Anyone who attempts to stifle the open Internet must contend with the millions of Internet users prepared to defend it.But this particular fight is not yet over. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm
The implications are clear: Anyone who attempts to stifle the open Internet must contend with the millions of Internet users prepared to defend it.But this particular fight is not yet over. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
The defendant has written about his case on his own blog, “Paid News in Goa”. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
But then, almost casually, the court drops this footnote: Despite [defendant’s] argument to the contrary, comment K offers no protection to [it]. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:09 am
The simple theft charge carries 1 to 3 years. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:30 am
Knowledge requires a defendant to be aware of the virtual certainty of harm and to act notwithstanding that knowledge. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:21 pm
Put simply the Court has two choices at such a hearing, set out in CPR55.8(1). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:54 am
Defendant testifies that he heard someone at the door, looked around the kitchen wall, saw the officers--unknown to be officers, and ducked back into the kitchen to hide in the closet. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:25 pm
., 529 U.S. 266 (2000), in which uncorroborated information from an anonymous tip emanating from an “unknown caller” phoning from an “unknown location” was deemed insufficient to warrant a Terry stop). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 11:35 pm
This application was Published for Opposition in January, 2011 and for some unknown reason, Stellar Allstar Cheer Academy Opposed it. [read post]
