Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 2,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
Written by Susan Neuberger Weller On July 6, 2012, in Lebewohl v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:59 am
Right to a disciplinary hearing survives the individual’s retirement from the position Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0100105/2008, Judge: Marcy S. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:37 am
"[U]nder federal law, TSA agents could legally search [Defendant's] entire bag for explosives or other safety hazards. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
Airways v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:34 am
People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
S. 42, 44– 45 (1950); Sonzinsky v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:11 pm
All Line, Inc., 2012 IL App (2d) 111027-U, when it affirmed a circuit court's order granting judgment on the pleadings in a non-compete case. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:16 am
In a word, yes! [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In 2009, I wrote about Watkins v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In 2009, I wrote about Watkins v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
The Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:16 am
S. 522, 539-541 (1987) (rejecting First Amendment challenge to law prohibiting certain unauthorized uses of the word “Olympic” and recognizing that such uses harm the U. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
Wickard, 317 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
S. 833, 841 (1986) (quoting Aptheker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
Court's previous holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm
See U. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
Visitors often look quizzically at the inscriptions because, where they would expect to see the letter “u,” they see “v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:53 am
The numerical value of this word in the Abjad numeral system is 19. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm
If the user is supplying the program with inputs in order to generate the outcome–using the program as a tool, in other words, then it seems quite right that the user would solely own any copyright that results, just like a user of a word-processing program owns the documents he or she writes with it. [read post]
