Search for: "CASH v. UNITED STATES" Results 1741 - 1760 of 2,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2023, 5:40 pm by Michael Lowe
United States, 529 U.S. 667 (2000), as: a misappropriation of funds that enriches a person of power or influence who uses the power or influence to make a different individual, organization, or company richer. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Nan Aron
The cumulative effect of the Roberts Court’s decisions in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:49 am by Staci Zaretsky
Barrington Hills is a cushy little village that ranks 88th on the list of highest-income places in the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:35 pm by Employment Services
The United States Supreme Court issued two decisions last year that are likely to increase the number of retaliation lawsuits because they expand the scope of protection. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:11 am
Supreme Court Ruling The United States Supreme Court recently considered this issue in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:29 am
The Bottom Line:   On July 6, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Matson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
While StoneRidge decreased the use of class action litigation against auditors in the United States, more foreign countries are permitting class action suits against auditors as a way to enhance shareholder protection. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:17 pm
Looking inward, Citibank, AIG, and Bank of America could be thought of as instrumentalities of the United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Bush signed into law a repatriation holiday, or corporate tax holiday, allowing multinational companies holding funds offshore to bring those into the United States at a reduced tax rate of just 5.25%, dramatically lower than the 35% statutory rate. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:29 am
The Bottom Line:   On July 6, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Matson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:30 am
  Answering all of these "difficult questions at the core of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence" in the negative (and suppressing all seized evidence) in United States v. [read post]