Search for: "California v. Force" Results 1741 - 1760 of 6,450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
However, MPS Deputy Assistant Commissioner Duncan Ball said the force was “extremely disappointed with the negative and unbalanced tone” of the report, insisting the pilot had been successful. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:38 am by Dan Bressler
Homelessness Suit” — “Advocacy groups suing several Southern California cities over their treatment of homeless residents have asked a California federal court to disqualify Jones Day from representing three of the cities, saying the firm previously represented a related advocacy group in a similar suit. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
The Riverside County Superior Court just granted a motion filed by Compassion & Choices on behalf of two terminally ill Californians seeking to intervene in the Ahn v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm by Guest Contributor
  This incident would forever be a life changing event for many, and the force behind a policy, legislative, and regulatory sea-change in meat inspection and prevention of foodborne illnesses. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J handed down a judgment in the case of Birmingham City Council v Afsar. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 10:15 am by Eric Goldman
Anaheim Police Sergeant Juan Reveles of the Orange County Human Trafficking Task Force in Southern California said Backpage’s closure represented a double-edged sword for law enforcement. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:51 am by Barbara Lichman
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987); to a regulation that deprives property of all of its economically viable use, Lucas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
Township of Scott and Justice Stephen Breyer’s in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
  New Relists Republic of Sudan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:11 pm by John Floyd
  The doctrine is not without significant legal controversy as evidenced by a May 13, 2019 decision by the Supreme Court in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Allen Matkins, Keith Bishop notes that the decision “almost certainly invalidates California’s ban [on immoral and scandalous marks] as well. [read post]