Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 4,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 4:28 pm
Specifically, the draft Provisions provide certain exemptions to the requirement to adopt a transfer mechanism under Article 38 of the PIPL. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:11 am
The representation concerned a property located at 476 Broadway a/k/a 38 Crosby Street, New York, New York, Apartment 1 OR (the “unit”). [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:59 am
Therefore, a court is duty bound under Section 38 to impound an Unstamped Instrument. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
” Although Supreme Court Rule 307(a)(1) does not use the word “stay,” the Supreme Court has previously held that Rule 307 does give jurisdiction to reduce stays of arbitration and administrative orders. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 5:31 pm
XIVbis :1 lit. c and therefore incompatible with WTO obligations. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 8:54 pm
State of Indiana, a 2-1 opinion, Judge Baker's partial dissent begins on p. 13:I agree with the majority's determination that our legislature's amendment of Indiana Code section 35-38-1-7.1 indicates an intention to change the common law as it existed before April 2005 regarding the requirement of "a sentencing statement anytime the trial court imposes a sentence other than the presumptive. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:46 pm
A net gain of 38 delegates for Clinton. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
[1] Judicial Diversity: Accelerating Change, page 7 [2] ibid., page 7 [3] ibid., page 5 [4] As of 1 October 2014. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 6:01 am
" (See, e.g., Mand Decl., Exs. 38, 42.) [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 5:10 am
North Carolina does not require registration or license to serve Process in North Carolina. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
See C.A.R. 38(e); State ex rel. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:29 pm
See 38 U.S.C. 8127(d). [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
Does Egilman’s opinion hold water? [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:13 pm
Final EIS at Appendix 1. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:17 pm
United States concerning Special Prosecutor Jaworski and the regulation then in force, 38 Fed.Reg. 30739, which required “extraordinary improprieties” for his removal: So long as this regulation is extant it has the force of law. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
This minority view was based on a different interpretation of the facts and on the Giuliano and Lagarde Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations (OJ EU No C 282-1). [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:01 pm
It is to be noted in this context that this assertion does not correspond to the content of the client’s letter because it does not contain any indications on the scope of the patent protection to be obtained […]. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 1:34 pm
Here’s what I found: 1. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:34 am
That decision led the parties to jointly stipulate to dismiss Doe's civil action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), thereby mooting the case. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
To invoke the "fraud in the inducement" exception, a plaintiff must demonstrate three elements: (1) that the defendant engaged in an intentional misrepresentation; (2) that the misrepresentation occurred before the contract was formed; and (3) that the alleged misrepresentation was extraneous to the contract. [read post]
