Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2012, 5:02 am
The JOBS Act provides that net worth is to be calculated in the same fashion as the test for accredited investors (accredited investors are those with a net worth of $1 million or more). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Id. at *71-74. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:50 am
Blakey, supra, 164 N.J. at 71. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
The Child Support Standards Chart is released each year on or before April 1. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:47 pm
” Ballan, 71 M.J. at 36 (citing Puckett v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
While the first and last of these conditions are satisfied in the present case, the fact that the appellant now does not request more than was in fact offered in the R 71(3) communication and so could have been achieved even without the (refused) OPs, means that reimbursement would not be equitable. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:09 am
Supp. 2d 1264, 1270-71 (W.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:37 pm
Big and Open Data is also being driven by what the authors of The Role of Crowdsourcing for Better Governance in Fragile State Contexts[1] call the philosophy of ‘open-source governance’, that advocates an intellectual link between the principles of the open-source and open-content movements, and basic democratic principles. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:22 pm
Its regular corporate counsel does not engage in patent work, so it refers the company to a lawyer (Kathy Worthington) who is knowledgeable about intellectual property matters. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
Let us consider each of these three contentions in turn, for each has a complicated story behind it–a story that does not favor the plurality’s conclusion. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Ballan, 71 M.J. 28, 36 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (Baker, C.J., concurring in the result). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:17 am
” Benson, supra, at 70–71 (emphasis added); see also Bilski, supra, at ___ (slip op., at 6–7); Diehr, 450 U. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
Tr. 71, docket no. 33. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:10 am
Does this constitute good service? [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:14 am
., Professor Cheng’s discussion of these critiques at pp 50-3, 65, 70-1). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court in the landmark Alaska v John Doe case. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Does any monograph count? [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
The law does not permit it. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:44 pm
Super. 71, 74 (App. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:00 pm
Y (Case C-71/11). [read post]
