Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2011, 12:07 pm
Cir. 1999), discussed in this post, and also (though the analogy is less direct, given the difference in the statutes involved) with the Nebraska Supreme Court People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:44 am
In the case of Deligans v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:28 am
Regina v Budimir and another; Interfact Ltd Liverpool City Council [2010] EWCA Crim 148; [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 166 “Where defendants had been convicted of criminal offences under a statute enacted by Parliament which was unenforceable owing to a failure by the United Kingdom Government, before its enactment, to comply with a Directive from the European Community, it was not incumbent upon the Court of Appeal to re-open their cases out of time unless their… [read post]
17 May 2018, 11:02 am
I would also probably have given Huang v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:47 pm
These include Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 7:55 pm
I have not given any part of my estate to my son, Bruce Drummond, because he does not visit me and he does not need anything from me. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 2:33 pm
Especially given the -- somewhat questionable, in my view -- strategic choices made by the parties below.To begin with, there was the decision made by counsel for the Estate of Laci Peterson to move for summary judgment on the fact that Peterson killed his wife based solely on the record of his criminal conviction. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:46 am
Given this fact, we thought we'd point out to our readers the recent Ninth Circuit decision in Rosa v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:00 am
Thus, a radio DJ job may have a greater geographic reach than a hair stylist’s job (e.g., 50 miles v. 5 miles). [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 7:57 pm
In racketeering, securities fraud and obstruction trial involving an FBI agent who passed law enforcement information to a co-defendant to benefit from stock trades, evidence concerning one defendant's "possible ties to the 9/11 terrorist attacks" was not unfairly prejudicial where curative instructions were given, the defense opened the door to the issue, and the trial court took extra precautions to limit the evidence, in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
See R. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
Tort Talkers may recall that I recently highlighted the case of McMillen v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:00 am
Thus, a radio DJ job may have a greater geographic reach than a hair stylist’s job (e.g., 50 miles v. 5 miles). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:36 am
In Gutierrez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:15 am
Mirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Samin v Westminster City Council, heard 9-10 March 2015. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Meredith Render (University of Alabama - School of Law) has posted Blake v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:32 pm
Thornton and Cook v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:00 am
"One of the issues raised by Coach in his petition was that the hearing officer had relied on "hearsay testimony" in sustaining the U-Rating he was given. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:21 am
" Gaymar Industries, Inc. v. [read post]