Search for: "In Re McDonald"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 1,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2022, 8:42 am
McDonald’s Corp., 466 NE 2d 958 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1984 The admission of a document which refreshed the witness’s recollection can only be met with questions confirming that while the document may be in evidence, the witness at hand cannot recall anything today and anything beyond the scope of the document must be stricken. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Jenkins Issue: Whether the Court should overrule McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
This is sort of a weird set of facts; the kind of facts that led to the McDonald’s spilled coffee industry wide marketing campaign. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 8:55 am
You’re better off remaining silent. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Re-Examining Customary International Law and the Federal Courts. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:15 pm
There is nothing else along that road, and certainly nothing like a McDonalds, or any housing areas. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
Pasteurization only destroys the pathogens in the milk at the time of processing; if unsanitary conditions allow pathogens to re-enter the milk later, it will be contaminated again. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There are strong arguments that the narrow reading of Article 40.6.1(i) and the implication of an unenumerated right into Article 40.3.1 were unnecessary, and that all of the constitutional protections for freedom of speech should be (re-)integrated into Article 40.6.1(i) (see Tom Daly “Strengthening Irish Democracy: A Proposal to Restore Free Speech to Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution” (2009) 31 Dublin University Law Journal (ns) 228 (academia); Robert Noonan… [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:33 am
” In McDonald, the court held the Second Amendment right is applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, but “repeat[ed] [its] assurances” that “the right to keep and bear arms is not ‘a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose’ ” and that its holding “did not cast doubt on such longstanding regulatory measures as ‘prohibitions on the… [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Would not register the McDonald’s logo: representation of arches belong to us all, and combination to M doesn’t help because lettering/font doesn’t get copyright. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
McDonald, a lawsuit seeking to bar New York and New York City from considering race or ethnicity in connection with the allocation of COVID-19 treatments. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 5:30 am
[The Court may have overruled Chevron, but it has just inadvertently created a far more powerful deference doctrine with Salerno, all in service of narrowly reversing the Fifth Circuit.] [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged about this last week, but now I have a translation of both the majority and the dissent, translated by reader Rick Nemcik Cruz (many thanks to him for this). [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
That is worse than the infamous McDonald’s coffee case. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
At times, the judiciary’s resistance to delving into the factual underpinnings of expert witness opinions is extraordinary. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
She is a woman on fire, a woman on a mission to help others enter (and re-enter) society as productive and contributing members of their community. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 10, 2008 In re: McDonald, No. 06-4120 In a murder case in which a key witness in the matter later claimed that she provided perjured testimony against petitioner, that the trial prosecutor coerced her into a non-consensual sexual relationship and the perjured testimony, and the prosecutor's brother corroborated her claims, a motion for permission to file a second or successive habeas corpus petition is granted where: 1) it was not… [read post]
19 May 2024, 1:04 pm
You're morehouse men. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:45 am
Police nationwide are secretly exploiting intrusive technologies with the feds’ complicity. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. [read post]
