Search for: "JANE DOE " Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2015, 8:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted panel rehearing in the case captioned Jane Doe No. 14 v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:51 am by By Amanda Goad, LGBT Project
But that does not mean we can throw up our hands and dismiss the issue as irrelevant to our legal work. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 12:24 pm
 The Court of Appeal uses "Jane Doe" and initials, whereas the more robust newspaper story uses actual names. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 6:55 am by Sebastian Brady
The AUMF does include some language meant to define how the military must engage in the conflict, however, specifically by prohibiting “enduring offensive” ground operations. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
Right now, we have no good answer to the problem of what to do about future long-term detainees—except to hope it does not arise. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
This is due primarily to the idea expression distinction. 6Accord Jane Ginsburg, Authors and Users in Copyright, 45 J. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am by Michael Lowe
Jane Does #3 and #4 File Motion to Join With Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Recently Jane Does #3 and #4 came forward and filed their Joinder Motion in this CVRA lawsuit. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:12 pm by Daniel Schwartz
Now, does this mean you should go into full on panic mode and ban all mention of the movie? [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Michael Risch
maybe not as much) and to a random sample of twitter users (do professors tweet different information than Katy Perry or Jane Doe? [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
While this is a compilation of very readable, eloquent texts, which make the engagement an intellectual pleasure, it does not really add substantial value to the previously presented perspectives and at times lack academic rigor. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Where does such hostility come from? [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:42 pm by Cyrus Farivar
The case emerged last year from a woman, referred to in court documents as “Jane Doe #1,” who came forward to local authorities in early October 2014 after being briefly arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol in late August 2014 in San Ramon, California, about 35 miles east of San Francisco. [read post]