Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 9,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
Some of the background can be found in an article entitled “Right of Reply: A Comparative Approach” [pdf] by Andras Koltay, who also discusses the position in the United States and Canada. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 11:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:36 pm
A trademark owner can save time, expense, and effort by adopting an inherently distinctive mark and ensuring it is registered on the Principal Register with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:04 pm
United States, 2012 U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am
In Matal v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
United States, in which the Court held that an individual who surrenders his guns to police and is then convicted of a felony has the right to transfer those guns to an independent third party, including by selling them. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
Hashtag as a trademarkThe United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in § 1202.18 of The Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) provides that a mark consisting of variants of the term HASHTAG or the hash symbol mayfunction as a mark only when such mark “functions as an identifier of the source of the applicant’s goods or services”. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
California Emergency Physicians Medical Group; Med America; Mark Alderdice; Robert Buscho, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (No. 12-16514) (April 8, 2015). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 12:27 am
Also, GAC had had registrations for "BIOFORCE" and "SENTALLOY" in the United States whereas the Proprietor did not have any registration for the said marks anywhere in the world. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm
Marks, 876 F.3d at 422. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm
In Larry Harmon Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm
In Larry Harmon Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
