Search for: "Murphy v State" Results 1741 - 1760 of 2,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Professor Dorf acknowledged that the so-called anti-commandeering doctrine (affirmed as recently as 2018 in Murphy v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm by MacIsaac
 86 (S.C.), or a shopping centre, as in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Thomas Key
Having worked for a legal aid organization that serves the arts community in my state, this Kat has learned that the intersection of arts and law provides a variety of unique insights and challenges. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Murphy, Jeffrie G. and Jean Hampton. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Laurin said Erin Murphy's book, Inside the Cell: The Dark Side of Forensic DNA is "burning a hole in my desk" for wont of reading. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
North: Because the privilege against self-incrimination “reflects many of our fundamental values and most noble aspirations,” Murphy v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:30 am by Mark Walsh
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court later, under the caption Murphy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
Although Man Choi Chiu contends that the LLC’s records were incorrect, he cannot subsequently take a position contrary to that taken in the income tax returns which he admitted that he signed (see Mahoney-Buntzman v Buntzman, 12 NY3d 415, 422; Livathinos v Vaughan, 121 AD3d 485; Winship v Winship, 115 AD3d 1328; Czernicki v Lawniczak, 74 AD3d 1121, 1125; Peterson v Neville, 58 AD3d 489). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:00 pm by Liz Campbell
The relevant aspects of this Article state that “1. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
That, combined with an intervening Supreme Court decision (Murphy Bros., Inc. v. [read post]