Search for: "People v Smith" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm by Elie Mystal
It makes them seem more real, and knowing that these people watch Cheech & Chong movies and South Park episodes makes me trust their judgment a little bit more. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:10 pm
  It's really, really hard to cross-examine a transcript, which is why those robed people in D.C. bothered to decide Crawford v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
  And one of the earlier cases that was cited was that of Smith v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, earlier this year, the New York Court of Appeals held in People v Harnett that a guilty plea to a sex offense is not automatically invalidated because the defendant was not warned that he may be subject to SOMTA. [read post]
13 May 2007, 4:52 pm
Id. at 45.As noted by Justice Souter in his dissenting opinion in Kansas v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 11:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court in 2003 stated in Smith v Doe that the ex post facto application of these Sex Offender Registration Laws was not Punitive in nature, but civil and regulatory intent. [read post]