Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 1741 - 1760 of 55,689
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
”  Asset managers, both private and public, use their voting power to pressure companies to do more for all those they affect but who do not own shares. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The agency instead must point to ‘clear congressional authorization’ for the power it claims. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm by Anna E. Bullock
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 10:44 am by Eric Fruits
These stations rightly saw CATV providing “out of market” signals as competition for viewers and advertising, as discussed in Carter Mountain Transmission Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:37 am by Eric Goldman
Could it be that, in the print-on-demand context, trademark law is more powerful to rightsowners than copyright? [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(In contrast, we have long backed an amendment to overturn Buckley v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Satya Marar
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Andrea Boyack
In the 1920s, courts considered and ultimately upheld such land use schemes in opinions that include the seminal 1926 Supreme Court decision of Village of Euclid v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during February 2024 Nine consistory court judgments were circulated in 2024 including:  Procedure Churchyards and burials Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Also included are: Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; Visitations; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 pm by Ilya Somin
In a recent post at the Originalism Blog, he skewers the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Trump v. [read post]