Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 10:48 am
And while the attached judgment in the Florida case [State of Florida v Federated Institute for Patent and Trademark Registry (FIPTR), see also petition for certiorari here] does not count as true research, it is my contention that it gives a snapshot of the kind of impact that such invitations can have and are having. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Fraser v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am
Wares and Services Manual expands (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trade-marks: Use it as registered: Bigras v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Royal Society of Arts, London. 9 May 2012, 6.30pm: LSE Public Conversation - Dial M for Murdoch with Tom Watson MP and Martin Hickman (chair: Damian Tambini). [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm
The public is, as usual, left in a state of misinformed confusion. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:58 am
In Bufkin v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm
Press Gazette considers the significance of this move given that the Observer left the Royal Charter-mandated regulator, Impress following claims that it attempted to bury an internal impartiality review. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
” (Quoted in para 44 (v) of Lord Kerr’s judgment) In the event a decision was made on 11 July 2011 that a public inquiry would not be conducted. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm
As the review states, the decision is that the offer is suitable now and at the time she returns to work. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm
As the review states, the decision is that the offer is suitable now and at the time she returns to work. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
On the contrary, the Germans started employing new weapons of indiscriminate killing—V-1 and V-2 rockets. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:49 am
Mitchel of the Ontario Superior Court made a ruling in the Estate of Victor Hugh Priebe (Royal Trust v University of Western Ontario et al). [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
Starting in 2004 with the decision in Sosa v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am
Accordingly, the new Data Protection Act 2018 received Royal Assent at 3:06pm on Wednesday 23 May 2018, just less than 32 hours before the coming into force of the General Data Protection Regulation. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In 2008 in K.U. v. [read post]
