Search for: "STATE v. HAND" Results 1741 - 1760 of 31,205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 8:03 pm by David Kemp
Though a state, as an employer, is not required to offer benefits to its employees, when it chooses to give some employees benefits, it must do so in an even-handed manner. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:03 pm by David Kemp
Though a state, as an employer, is not required to offer benefits to its employees, when it chooses to give some employees benefits, it must do so in an even-handed manner. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court handed down today its judgment in OPO v MLA ([2015] UKSC 32), the case in which the Court of Appeal had – extraordinarily – granted an injunction to prevent the publication of a book solely on the ground that it might cause psychological harm to the author’s son. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:32 am
The Supremes handed down a trio of decisions yesterday — Global Crossing v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 3:47 am
State and State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
A crash occurred in Polk County on November 24, 2010VEH 1 WAS NORTHBOUND ON HWY 17, VEH 2 WAS SOUTHBOUND ON HWY 17LOST CONTROL DUE TO WEATHER CONDITIONS, ENTERED NORTHBOUND LANESCOLLIDING HEAD ON WITH V ... [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am by Florence Plisner (Bristows)
On 8 October 2021, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) handed down his decision in an action brought by Royalty Pharma Collection Trust (“Royalty Pharma”) for approximately €23 million in royalty payments from Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH (“Boehringer”) (Royalty Pharma Collection Trust v Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH [2021] EWHC 2692 (Pat)). [read post]